The Pac-12 Conference has been a powerhouse in college sports for decades, but recently it has seen a decline in its success. This decline has been attributed to a number of strategic mistakes made by the conference. In this article, we will examine the 12 strategic mistakes of the Pac-12 that have resulted in its decline.
The first mistake was the decision to expand the conference to include the University of Colorado and the University of Utah in 2011. While these two schools have had some success in their respective sports, they have not been able to compete at the same level as the other Pac-12 teams. This has resulted in a decrease in overall competitiveness and a decrease in revenue for the conference.
The second mistake was the decision to reduce the number of conference games from nine to eight. This decision was made in order to increase the number of non-conference games, which would theoretically increase revenue. However, this decision has had the opposite effect, as teams are now playing fewer conference games and thus missing out on potential revenue from those games.
The third mistake was the decision to move the conference championship game from the traditional site of Los Angeles to Santa Clara, California. This move was made in order to increase revenue, but it has had the opposite effect as attendance has been significantly lower than expected.
The fourth mistake was the decision to reduce the number of television appearances for Pac-12 teams. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer people are watching Pac-12 games and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The fifth mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in bowl games. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in bowl games and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The sixth mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in NCAA tournaments. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in NCAA tournaments and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The seventh mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in post-season tournaments. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in post-season tournaments and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The eighth mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in non-conference games. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in non-conference games and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The ninth mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in bowl games outside of their own conference. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in bowl games outside of their own conference and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The tenth mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in NCAA tournaments outside of their own conference. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in NCAA tournaments outside of their own conference and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The eleventh mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in post-season tournaments outside of their own conference. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in post-season tournaments outside of their own conference and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
The twelfth mistake was the decision to reduce the number of Pac-12 teams participating in non-conference games outside of their own conference. This decision was made in order to reduce costs, but it has had the opposite effect as fewer teams are participating in non-conference games outside of their own conference and thus generating less revenue for the conference.
In conclusion, these twelve strategic mistakes have had a significant impact on the decline of the Pac-12 Conference. The decisions were made with good intentions, but they have had an unintended negative effect on the conference’s success and revenue. It is important for conferences to be aware of these mistakes and learn from them so that they can avoid making similar mistakes in the future.
